Pressure Ulcers Prevention and Management

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
Boyko, T. V., Longaker, M. T., & Yang, G. P.
Advances in Wound Care. Web.
Moore, Z. E., & Patton, D.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Web.
Hariri, A., Chen, F., Moore, C. and Jokerst, J.V.
Wound Repair and Regeneration. Web.
Jackson, D., Sarki, A., Betteridge, R., & Brooke, J.
International Journal of Nursing Studies. Web.
Article Title and Year Published Review of the Current Management of Pressure Ulcers
2018
Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.
2018
Noninvasive staging of pressure ulcers using photoacoustic imaging
2019

Medical device-related pressure ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019

Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative) What are the available treatments for pressure ulcers? Are the risk assessment tools eligible for treating pressure ulcers? What are the effects of using photoacoustic imaging while treating pressure ulcers? Wounds identified with the weight of clinical equipment are one of the key markers of patient safety and the nature of medical care in clinical settings.
Purposes/Aim of Study Review the accessible intervention for pressure ulcer prevention. To evaluate if risk assessment tools help reduce pressure ulcer To explore the efficacy of photoacoustic imaging. To identify what pressure-related devices are effective for ulcer cure.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Qualitative Quantitative Quantitative Primary research
Setting/Sample Clinical settings, no sample Hospital settings, 1000 participants Clinical settings Clinical settings, 126.150 patients
Methods: Intervention/Instruments Process of observation Randomized Controlled Trials
Cluster trials
Experiment Experiment, review, cross-sectional studies
Analysis Content analysis Experimental analysis Quantitative image analysis Meta-analysis
Key Findings For large ulcers, ulcers with insufficient wound healing
progressive or ulcers with chronic osteomyelitis
The possibility of reconstructive surgery can now be considered.
To date, there is no great proof from randomized controlled studies recommending that leading an organized weight sore hazard appraisal influences the frequency of weight ulcers when compared to chance evaluation utilizing a clinical judgment. This photoacoustic-based approach may have clinical implications for monitoring skin conditions, including pressure ulcers. These gadget pressure wounds are a significant general medical problem, particularly because these wounds influence patients ‘ prosperity and increment the expense of clinical consideration for the two patients and specialists.
Recommendations If standard approaches don’t work
Adequate complementary therapies can be applied, including biophysical methods.
The material can be further used as a reference and the topic is to be investigated more deeply. The photoacoustic equipment may be used to identify the ulcer, its depth, and measure the stage. It is necessary to inform about strategies to increase the number of messages and assess the risk of bedsores associated with medical devices
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project The article explores the theoretical basis of pressure ulcers treatment. The article helps to understand the risk assessment procedures. The article carries a purely practical experiment that can be further reproduced and implemented in clinical settings of every hospital. The study helps to establish which device is to be used
Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
Westby, M., et al.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Web.
Bamba, R., Madden, J. J., Hoffman, A. N., Kim, J. S., Thayer, W. P., Nanney, L. B., & Spear, M. E.
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. Web.
Hommel, A., Gunningberg, L., Idvall, E. and Bååth, C
2017Journal of Clinical Nursing. Web.
Kaewprag, P., et al
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision- Making. Web.
Article Title and Year Published Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.
2017
Flap reconstruction for pressure ulcers: an outcomes analysis
2017
Successful factors to prevent pressure ulcers – an interview study Predictive models for pressure ulcers from intensive care unit electronic health records using Bayesian networks.
2017
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative) What are the effects of dressings of ulcers? Patients who went through the medical procedure for leg ulcers normally have different hazard factors for the advancement of postoperative intricacies. What are the primary factors of ulcer prevention? Distinguishing exact hazard elements of weight ulcers is basic to deciding fitting anticipation procedures
Purposes/Aim of Study Evaluate the effect of dressing and local treatment on the healing of bedsores in any medical facility. The investigation of countless investigations of patients in the populace with bedsores uncovered target proof of a connection and results after fold closure. To investigate effective elements to forestall pressure ulcers in medical clinic settings. To investigate quiet clinical information alongside hazard factors for pressure ulcers in an emergency unit from electronic wellbeing record information.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Quantitative Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative
Setting/Sample In clinical settings, 2947 participants Clinical settings Clinical settings Clinical settings
Methods: Intervention/Instruments Clinical trials, reviews Retrospective chart review of patients Interview Three-stage framework
Analysis Meta-analyses Outcomes analysis Content analysis Predictive analysis
Key Findings It is difficult to figure out which dressings or neighborhood cures are well on the way to fix bedsores, and it is commonly muddled whether the examined medicines are more viable than a physiological bandage. The examination uncovered numerous factors associated with a high frequency of genuine postoperative entanglements. In this work, the avoidance of weight wounds is essential. In this work, the treatment of pressure sores is vital. It seems that it is easier for smaller hospitals to establish and maintain an effective prevention organization. The bayesian system-based model gives a novel structure to essentially improve the affectability of the expectation model.
Recommendations More examination is expected to decide whether exceptional dressings with tropical substances improve the odds of weight ulcers mending. Risk factors need to be considered when providing patchwork, and risk reduction strategies should be applied in patients before repairing pressure ulcers. Methodologies are proposed to progress clinical authority, information, aptitudes, and capacities for the pivotal execution of weight ulcer avoidance. The new model can be explored and implemented alongside this model.
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone The study shows that not a treatment guarantees to provide good results. Using risk reduction strategies will further help to improve dressing. It is necessary to find more effective ulcer prevention strategies. The article demonstrates the usage of a new model and proves its efficacy.

References

Bamba, R., Madden, J. J., Hoffman, A. N., Kim, J. S., Thayer, W. P., Nanney, L. B., & Spear, M. E. (2017). Flap reconstruction for pressure ulcers: an outcomes analysis. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 5(1), e1187.

Boyko, T. V., Longaker, M. T., & Yang, G. P. (2018). Review of the current management of pressure ulcers. Advances in Wound Care, 7(2), 57–67.

Hariri, A., Chen, F., Moore, C. and Jokerst, J.V. (2019), Noninvasive staging of pressure ulcers using photoacoustic imaging. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 27, 488-496.

Hommel, A., Gunningberg, L., Idvall, E. and Bååth, C. (2017). Successful factors to prevent pressure ulcers – an interview study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26, 182-189.

Jackson, D., Sarki, A., Betteridge, R., & Brooke, J. (2019). Medical device-related pressure ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 92, 109-120.

Kaewprag, P., et al. (2017). Predictive models for pressure ulcers from intensive care unit electronic health records using Bayesian networks. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision-Making, 27(65).

Moore, Z. E., & Patton, D. (2019). Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Westby, M., et al. (2017). Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

NursingBird. (2022, January 28). Pressure Ulcers Prevention and Management. Retrieved from https://nursingbird.com/pressure-ulcers-prevention-and-management/

Reference

NursingBird. (2022, January 28). Pressure Ulcers Prevention and Management. https://nursingbird.com/pressure-ulcers-prevention-and-management/

Work Cited

"Pressure Ulcers Prevention and Management." NursingBird, 28 Jan. 2022, nursingbird.com/pressure-ulcers-prevention-and-management/.

References

NursingBird. (2022) 'Pressure Ulcers Prevention and Management'. 28 January.

References

NursingBird. 2022. "Pressure Ulcers Prevention and Management." January 28, 2022. https://nursingbird.com/pressure-ulcers-prevention-and-management/.

1. NursingBird. "Pressure Ulcers Prevention and Management." January 28, 2022. https://nursingbird.com/pressure-ulcers-prevention-and-management/.


Bibliography


NursingBird. "Pressure Ulcers Prevention and Management." January 28, 2022. https://nursingbird.com/pressure-ulcers-prevention-and-management/.