Nurse Robaczynski’s Patient Mercy Killing

Cite this

On the whole, it can be argued that Ms. Robaczynski did kill Mr. Gessner. This is because she decided to forgo the patient’s treatment when that treatment was necessary for him to continue living. In fact, the nurse took active actions to disconnect the patient from his life supports.

Cut 15% OFF your first order
We’ll deliver a custom Medical Ethics paper tailored to your requirements with a good discount
Use discount
322 specialists online

However, the fact that Mr. Gessner would probably have died in a few hours is a major extenuating circumstance. The nurse was probably trying to alleviate the patient’s suffering (although it seems unlikely that he was suffering – in his comatose condition, he probably was unable to feel anything). Nevertheless, there might theoretically have existed a tiny possibility that the patient would survive, and it should not have been the nurse’s decision about whether or not to disconnect him from his life supports.

It is also suspicious that the nurse said she (only) does this kind of action for “GORKs” (Fry, Veatch, & Taylor, 2011, p. 233), which means that there probably have been other patients in a similar condition whom the nurse disconnected.

If Mr. Gessner had asked Ms. Robaczynski to disconnect him from his life supports, then the action of forgoing the treatment would have been difficult to classify as a murder. On the contrary, the nurse would have been simply executing the patient’s decision.

It should be stressed that generally speaking, if the patient had asked the nurse to disconnect him from his life supports, the action of not disconnecting him could have probably been viewed as some type of offense. This is because, in this situation, if the nurse had not stopped treatment, she would have been forcing the patient to take his medications and use his life supports.

Therefore, in the situation when the patient asks the nurse to disconnect him, the nurse’s action of disconnection cannot be viewed as a crime – at least because not doing this action would probably be considered an offense (and thus, if both disconnecting and not disconnecting were crimes, the nurse would commit a crime whatever she did, which is absurd). In addition, disconnecting the patient from life supports (i.e., not forcing him to take treatments) is very different from e.g., giving the patient a poison injection, which might indeed be viewed as a murder.

Reference

Fry, S. T., Veatch, R. M., & Taylor, C. R. (2011). Case studies in nursing ethics (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

On-Time Delivery!
Get your customized and 100% plagiarism-free paper done in as little as 3 hours
Let’s start
322 specialists online

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

NursingBird. (2021, January 13). Nurse Robaczynski's Patient Mercy Killing. Retrieved from https://nursingbird.com/nurse-robaczynskis-patient-mercy-killing/

Reference

NursingBird. (2021, January 13). Nurse Robaczynski's Patient Mercy Killing. https://nursingbird.com/nurse-robaczynskis-patient-mercy-killing/

Work Cited

"Nurse Robaczynski's Patient Mercy Killing." NursingBird, 13 Jan. 2021, nursingbird.com/nurse-robaczynskis-patient-mercy-killing/.

References

NursingBird. (2021) 'Nurse Robaczynski's Patient Mercy Killing'. 13 January.

References

NursingBird. 2021. "Nurse Robaczynski's Patient Mercy Killing." January 13, 2021. https://nursingbird.com/nurse-robaczynskis-patient-mercy-killing/.

1. NursingBird. "Nurse Robaczynski's Patient Mercy Killing." January 13, 2021. https://nursingbird.com/nurse-robaczynskis-patient-mercy-killing/.


Bibliography


NursingBird. "Nurse Robaczynski's Patient Mercy Killing." January 13, 2021. https://nursingbird.com/nurse-robaczynskis-patient-mercy-killing/.