Kreutzer, J. (2015). Catastrophic Adverse Events During Cardiac Catheterization in Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension May Not Be So Rare. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 66(11), 1270-1272.
The article “Catastrophic Adverse Events During Cardiac Catheterization in Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension May Not Be So Rare” begins by examining how medical practitioners use different approaches to treat pulmonary hypertension (PH). This is the case because PH is one of the life-threatening conditions affecting many patients today. Kreutzer (2015) argues that “cardiac catheterization has been widely used during the diagnostic stage of pulmonary hypertension” (p. 1270). The author explains how different studies have supported the method. Such studies indicate that it is one of the best standards for supporting different patients (Kreutzer, 2015). The next step entails the use of various therapies to deal with this condition. Medical practitioners and physicians use different forms of “acute pulmonary vaso-reactivity testing in an attempt to understand the prognosis of the condition” (Kreutzer, 2015, p. 1271). This knowledge has been widely used to dictate the best treatment plan for the targeted condition. Past studies have therefore indicated that cardiac catheterization can produce different healthcare problems. Patients receiving cardiac catheterization through trans-femoral access tend to report increased cases of vascular complications. Such complications are usually dangerous and life-threatening. The complications have also been associated with increased medication costs, re-hospitalizations, and poor health outcomes.
Neupane, S., Dass, K., & Kollepara, L. (2014). Seeing double: Transient third nerve palsy after cardiac catheterization. Cor et Vasa, 56(5), 445-447.
According to the article “Seeing double: Transient third nerve palsy after cardiac catheterization”, some recent studies have identified a wide range of issues associated with different pulmonary vaso-reactivity testing methods. The article goes further to explain why different neurological complications emerge after cardiac catheterization (Neupane, Dass, & Kollepara, 2014). Some of these common problems include neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations and cerebrovascular injuries. Some patients have also reported cases of diplopia. This medical problem occurs due to the use of diagnostic catheterization. The above gaps explain why the researchers focused on new methods for executing various cardiac procedures. This is the case because trans-femoral access has been observed to cause discomfort and poor ambulation. As well, the method is widely associated with different complications. Such complications can also cause unanticipated deaths. That being the case, radial artery access is becoming popular among practitioners because it has the potential to reduce every serious complication.
Sai, C., Kumar, B., Srinivas, V., Vidhale, A., Babu, R., & Gill, G. (2015). Predictors of renal artery stenosis in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for suspected coronary artery disease. Journal of Indian College of Cardiology, 5(3), 214-219.
The authors argue that many patients undergoing cardiac catheterization tend to record increased cases of Renal Artery Stenosis (RAS). The article also describes how some studies have identified RAS as one of the co-morbid conditions associated with different cardiovascular diseases (Sai et al., 2015). As well, patients undergoing catheterization or coronary angiography have been observed to have higher chances of having the condition. Individuals who fail to embrace the use of atherosclerosis report reduced cases of RAS. These developments continue to encourage medical researchers to examine the issues associated with this condition. The challenge has encouraged doctors and physicians to analyze the benefits of trans-radial access.
Physicians and practitioners have therefore been identifying the best practices to reduce unwanted complications. This current information offers new insights regarding the use of trans-femoral access (Sai et al., 2015). This understanding will therefore be used to conduct the suggested study. The proposed study will embrace the use of evidence-based research to analyze the trans-femoral and trans-radial accesses. The final discussion will outline the best practices and approaches towards using these two methods. The important goal will be to identify the best measures through which the major problems associated with different pulmonary testing approaches can be reduced. The trans-radial access technique reduces the discomfort experienced by the targeted patient. The method also improves the level of ambulation thus reducing complications.