Introduction
Mind, behavior, and body can be seriously affected by addictive disorders and mental health problems associated with them. Currently, there is no single strategy that guarantees the successful treatment of addiction disorders.
The choice of treatment depends on several factors. The most crucial of them include the drug used by the patient and the relative mental issues that started to develop due to specific drug abuse. The complexity of each case makes it hard to develop a single general solution that could help patients suffering from different types of drug abuse.
While diagnosing addiction disorders, different stages must be completed, from lab tests for urine, blood, and feces to a complex analysis performed by drug addiction disorder experts. Counselors and psychiatrists examine patients’ behavior in detail to find distinctive features of a type of addictive disorder. All the data collected from various sources is then analyzed.
Population & Intervention
Individuals of any age, gender, and social status can experience addiction disorders. These people may include adolescents and the youth, women, men, parents, friends, peers, workmates, family members, and students. Therapy groups include rehab professionals, disorder experts, counselors, healthcare workers, veterans, responders, mentors, sponsors, and psychiatrists.
Numerous aspects must be analyzed in order to fully understand the scope of the problem, the type of addictive disorder, and its distinctive features. All the above mentioned has to be considered when deciding on the best treatment in each case. The best strategy when dealing with addictive disorders implies concentration on a patient’s proficiency and strengths. Addiction disorder is generally believed to be caused by factors such as a discrepancy in thinking, learning, and regulation of emotions.
The Findings of the Study
Various features in patients’ behavior were detected attributed to substance abuse. In order to proceed with the treatment, a group of specialists has to conduct independent research to collect all the crucial data that gives an understanding of each patient’s weaknesses and strengths. A holistic approach provides the complete picture of the processes initiated by substance abuse and plays a crucial role in future improvements of the methods psychotherapy uses for clients with addictive disorders.
The advances in biology and the technologies that the healthcare system has begun to use in recent years will undoubtedly revolutionize the way psychiatrists work with patients. The individual approach has already proven to be a crucial step forward in the enhancement of medical care. Moreover, understanding the link between neurobiological mechanisms and behavior is an essential aspect of elucidating drug abuse-related targets (1). Therefore, all the above-mentioned approaches should be utilized to achieve the best result in psychotherapy for clients with addictive disorders.
Conclusion
Psychotherapy for clients with addictive disorders continues to rely primarily on the development of various unique strategies. Each strategy, despite some required standardization, is tailored to help each person realize the numerous cues and triggers, which in his/her case, create the vicious cycle that hinders the recovery prospects. Control of behavior also remains one of the key ingredients for the overall success of the treatment. There are numerous ways to assist people eager to fight substance abuse. Despite the fact that the efficiency of each treatment may vary from case to case, there are some distinctive trends. The psychological model has proven to be the most efficient treatment option. It outperforms all other strategies (including the non-self-denial-oriented treatments).
References
Muller, T. E., Fontana, B.D., Bertoncello, K. T., Franscescon, F., Mezzomo, N. J., Canzian, J., Stefanello, F. V., Parker, M. O., Gerlai, R., & Rosemberg, D. B. (2020). Understanding the neurobiological effects of drug abuse: Lessons from zebrafish models. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 100(6). Web.